With regard to the compatibility of Article . 19 described above with the Constitution , there is in fact a very close relationship between these legal decisions and the last sentence no . 231/2013.
of July 2014 in which the Court of Padua, entered in the area of the limitation period for an appeal of the dismissal related to the action of assessment, time to verify the existence of an employment relationship in relation to a person other than the one with which it was contracted.
With sentence no. 22728 of 4 October 2013, the Supreme Court, Employment Section ruled that the absence of joint liability for client company with regards to claims of the employee of the contracting company accuse at the end of the procurement contract.
The event concerns an employee of a contracting company, after being fired, who had not received from the employer, payment in lieu of notice and had approached the contracting company to obtain what was owed based on this title.
On the 10th of July in Milan at the GI Group's auditorium it was held the conference on the positive outlook of arbitration relating to employment.The speakers that took part at the conference were Avv. Mauro Rubino Sammartano, President of the European Court of Arbitration Strasbourg, Avv. Mario Fusani, a labour law expert with many years of experience, Dr. Fabio Begini, National Secretary at UIL-UILCOM and Dr. Davide Patruno, Human resources manager at the Maxi Zoo Italia S.p.a – Fresssnapf Group.
The case concerns an employee who had agreed to three successive contracts with Obiettivo Lavoro Spa on fixed-term employment, in virtue of which was made available to the Poste Italiane as postmen in order to provide for replacement of the missing personnel assigned to delivery service at the Campania region.